Alexander Karsh.

If you're hiring forAlexander Karsh

Curriculum built with experts

Judges and faculty own the legal and clinical doctrine. I design the learning architecture: the objectives, the sequence, the practice mechanics and the bench tools that make the material usable under pressure. These four cases show the structures I built, the options I put in front of faculty, and the decisions they made inside them. I've marked the status and evidence for each piece.

Page 1 of the opinion-writing checklist: the coordinating judge's list, built into two pages
DeliveredParticipant evaluationsSpring 2026

One family, all day: a family-law primer

One family's case ran through the day and ended with the opinion-writing checklist. Twelve of the fifteen judges who answered said they intend to make it a high priority.

Open the case
Jordan Ellis, the case file: the fictional defendant who came back after every block of Of Sound Mind
DeliveredParticipant evaluationsSummer 2026

A one-day behavioral science course for judges

One fictional defendant came back after every block, with one new layer in his file.

Open the case study
Front of a character card from the simulation: who you are, what you can draw on, your starting hand
PreparedRedesign, 2026

Comings and Goings: a simulation for new judges

What I designed and gave the faculty as a choice was to keep the three characters and vary their starting resources. Someone with a lot of money is going to have different options than somebody with no money but a lot of friends from work.

Open the case
Front of the two-page AI and digital evidence reference guide, summer 2026 version
PreparedSummer 2026 course

The AI-evidence reference guide

I built the guide from the faculty's materials and the national bench cards, and added sentence stems because the cards had nothing for judges to say.

Open the case

All the workNext route: getting busy experts to adopt new practice